BRANDOLAND: Talking to God...For You!

Monday, September 08, 2003


Last night, Smirky McChimperstein was kind enough to let us know that he’s gonna “ask” (Congress) for 87 BILLION bucks to fight the “war on terror” and to “liberate” (ie rebuild) Iraq. That figure comes on top of the 79 BILLION bucks that Congress approved back in April.


Any idea how GW intends to spend that cash?

Read on. This comes from Tom Tomorrow’s website, It’s a blog from Iraq. Unsubstantiated…but interesting nonetheless:

“One of my cousins works in a prominent engineering company in Baghdad- we’ll call the company H. This company is well-known for designing and building bridges all over Iraq. My cousin, a structural engineer, is a bridge freak. He spends hours talking about pillars and trusses and steel structures to anyone who’ll listen.

As May was drawing to a close, his manager told him that someone from the CPA wanted the company to estimate the building costs of replacing the New Diyala Bridge on the South East end of Baghdad. He got his team together, they went out and assessed the damage, decided it wasn’t too extensive, but it would be costly. They did the necessary tests and analyses (mumblings about soil composition and water depth, expansion joints and girders) and came up with a number they tentatively put forward- $300,000. This included new plans and designs, raw materials (quite cheap in Iraq), labor, contractors, travel expenses, etc.

Let’s pretend my cousin is a dolt. Let’s pretend he hasn’t been working with bridges for over 17 years. Let’s pretend he didn’t work on replacing at least 20 of the 133 bridges damaged during the first Gulf War. Let’s pretend he’s wrong and the cost of rebuilding this bridge is four times the number they estimated- let’s pretend it will actually cost $1,200,000. Let’s just use our imagination.

A week later, the New Diyala Bridge contract was given to an American company. This particular company estimated the cost of rebuilding the bridge would be around- brace yourselves- $50,000,000 !!”


Is there any chance that the “American company” is a subsidiary of Halliburton?

Me wonder.

It's not about oil. It's about oil, and bridges, and prisons, and telecommunications, and cheap labor, and...

More later.


Post a Comment

<< Home